An Ontario court has struck down sections of the province’s panhandling law as unconstitutional.
The Fair Change legal clinic launched a constitutional challenge of the Safe Streets Act, which prohibits soliciting in an aggressive manner and soliciting a “captive audience,” including people waiting to use an ATM or public transit.
- Download our app to get local alerts on your device
- Get the latest local updates right to your inbox
Fair Change argued the law violates several charter rights, including freedom of expression and the right not to be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment.
Superior Court Judge Robert Centa did not accept all of the Fair Change arguments, but ruled that most of the ways the law defines aggressive solicitation violate the presumption of innocence and prohibiting panhandling in certain locations violates freedom of expression rights.
The court left intact the sections against soliciting in an aggressive manner and threatening people with physical harm while soliciting, and upheld a …